War
Is Sweet for Those Who Have Not Tried It
and
other timely proverbs.
Larry Struck
Sometimes a pithy saying tells
you everything you need to know. Instead of detailed analyses or extensive
debate of an issue, a well-placed proverb can cut to the core. So it is with
the Adages of Erasmus, a collection assembled by the Renaissance scholar that
gathers the wisdom of ancient Greece and Rome. In its day, the early 1500s, the
Adages was a best seller and much better known than the work he is today best
remembered for, In Praise of Folly, also worth a look.
War is
sweet for those who have not tried it can be traced back over 2500
years when warfare was mainly a brutal hand to hand business. By comparison,
modern cyber-based war may seem clean and thrilling to spectators who don’t
have flesh in the game. It was apparently as easy then as now for an
inexperienced leader to unleash the dogs of war with a terrible order leading
to distant human destruction. Erasmus comments, “By his will the world is to be
thrown into an uproar with wars and slaughter, all things sacred and profane
are to be turned upside down.”
The bad behavior of an unfit
leader, and the example it sets, can leave us wondering whether this is some
kind of Machiavellian design worked out by grown naughty boys. Or are we
dealing with a different beast altogether whose dark nature is more
frightening? Good question. Not mutually exclusive views, but our contemporary
tendency to psychologize disorders and then prescribe therapy or meds contrasts
with earlier ages that would agree with the saying, A crooked branch, never straight. This older fatalistic attitude
holds that a twisted or warped character can’t be expected to bear good fruit,
allowing that even a broken clock is right twice a day. Erasmus believes that
“the evil prince…either knows nothing, or what he knows is how to bring about
public disaster.” Such a leader would be clouded
in mind and far removed from conventional notions of honesty or honor. Citizens
should ask if clinical deviance spares him from the penalties for treasonous
conduct in a nation of laws.
How would such an impetuous
leader gain the support of his people? If not through forced submission to a
tyrant, then more democratically by guile or public persuasion aided by the
contortions of sympathetic media. A ruler’s subjects would be led by the nose to do or think as
they’re told, even if believing it was their own free choice. The image comes
from oxen, cattle or horses that are led by a ring through the nostril. A
manipulative leader skilled in oratory or just plain fakery to get his way can
be said to sell smoke. Our more
modern smoke and mirrors also points
to empty promises, illusions or flattery, whatever helps make the sale.
Consensus makes it easier to
govern, but finding common ground with others who look too extreme or
delusional is tricky. Dialogue is usually recommended as the key to
communication and resolving differences. But suppose either party to the
conversation can’t understand or just isn’t interested in working toward
solutions. They may seem to be paying attention, nod and even make an
occasional comment. Maybe they’re acting a part to show cooperation while in
fact not caring at all about what’s said since their own agenda is already set
in motion. Or they could just be clueless and out of their depth. An ass (listening) to the lyre captures
some truth here: a donkey will twitch its ears as if appreciating music or
understanding speech. Point being that donkeys are always twitching their ears
so it doesn’t mean they understand a thing. Pearls
before swine is a similar biblical example. A more recent variation comes
from George Bernard Shaw: The single
biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.
It’s not surprising that so
many dysfunctional traits would have dire implications for an organization or
country led by toxic individuals. An old expression that vividly depicts the
result, A fish rots from the head down,
has become a favorite with management experts. While the description may not be
biologically accurate--innards and heart may go first—it still rings true. The
person(s) at the top of an organization will be responsible for deteriorating
standards and performance throughout. It’s a situation that stinks.
Erasmus offers a few thoughts in
a more constructive vein. “The first requisite [of good leadership] is to judge
rightly about each matter, because opinions are like springs from which all the
actions of life flow, and when they are contaminated everything must needs be
mismanaged.” To do this, “the mind of the prince must be freed from all false
ideas so that he can see what is truly good.” No doubt it’s an uphill battle
for the rare individual who can follow this advice while fighting the everyday
stormy sea of troubles, not to mention those slings and arrows of outrageous
fortune.
If a leader--whether of a
state, project, or family--can withstand the daily onslaught of media overload,
innovative disruption, and enemies’ dirty tricks, then there’s a chance for a
fresh start. Well begun is half done.
Sometimes just tackling an unappealing job is the hardest part; made worse if
you have to play defense at the same time. However if instead of making a good
beginning a leader rushes off in the wrong direction then others are left with
a needless mess to clean up later. As
Kurt Vonnegut would add: And so it goes…
The advice and wisdom we take
from proverbs cover every corner of life, from shameful depravity and comic
weakness to heroic triumph. An entire society looking for guidance could do
worse than heeding: Between friends all
is common. Although this maxim can
be taken as justification for
sharing everything, private property and all, it really suggests the basis for social
responsibility and general welfare: for all citizens to be able to meet basic
needs and have a chance for a happy life with a little help from their friends,
us. But what’s the plan to get that done? Ay, there’s the rub!